Showing posts sorted by relevance for query the priesthood. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query the priesthood. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

HISTORY OF "THE PRIESTHOOD" IN THE BOOKS



Image


Anastasia talks to Vladimir on a number of occasions about true historic events that have been 'covered up' by those she calls "the Priesthood". Anastasia has access to this information as it has been handed down to her through her family line, the Vedrus. As well, she is able to "see" for herself what happened during those times in history, through her "ray" which gives her the ability to see past and future events. Vladimir himself experienced 'travelling' with Anastasia both into the past and into the future on at least 3 occasions I can think of off-hand, during his 1995 and 1997 visits:
  • the battle of the young Vedrus men against the armies from the south prior to 1500AD 
  • a future school with an amphitheatre even before Vladimir knew anything about the Shchetinin Kin's School - Lycee School at Tekos 
  • a visit to another planet in real-time 

Vladimir had very strong and vivid experiences during these 'visions'. Anastasia and Vladimir were, in layman's terms, "astral travelling" or "remote viewing". We know that Vladimir experienced the same as Anastasia during these "visioning times" because they were able to conduct a seamless conversation about what they saw once they had returned fully into their bodies. Anastasia makes it very clear to readers of the Cedars books that history has been "adjusted" over time to keep future generations of people on planet Earth in the dark about what actually happened in times past.


During one of the discussions Anastasia has with Vladimir about the origins of "the Priesthood", Anastasia takes us right back into Egypt, circa 2000 BC when the Hebrews were slaves of the Pharaoh. Anastasia tells us about how the Pharoah was chosen by the Egyptian Priests. Boys would be brought into the temple where their skills, aptitude and malleability would be tested. One of the main qualities the Priests were looking for among their 'trainees' was a boy's ability to accept whole-heartedly that he is God. At that time, it was believed that the Pharaoh was directly descended biologically from Amen Ra, the Sun God.  Why do you think we still say "Amen" to this day in our Sun/Son-worshipping churches?  In Egypt, the boy chosen to be the next Pharaoh would have to carry a certain arrogance with him and have the kind of mind that would not question this supposed lineage. The second quality the boy/ young man would have would be to completely trust the Priests. In this way, the Priests of Egypt could remain quietly in the background manipulating all of the affairs of state.


The 'history' that we know about is of a man called Moses who had a brother named Aaron who was a priest of the Hebrew tribe known as "Levi". Presumably, this would mean that Moses was of that tribe also, if Aaron was his blood brother. Now if you go back a bit into your Bible knowledge, you will remember that it was this little Hebrew infant Moses who was set to float in a reed basket of some kind down the Nile river. The Pharaoh of the time had a dream saying that a scion of the Hebrews would rise into ascendancy and usurp him, so he declared all Hebrew babies of a certain age be put to death. Moses' mother set him to float in an effort to save his little life. Moses was plucked from the water by an Egyptian Princess supposedly, and grew up in the court of the Pharoah. Moses never lost contact with his Hebrew slave family of birth because, ironically, Moses' own mother became the "wet nurse" to the infant. Moses own mother was a slave within the court of the then Pharaoh apparently. Perhaps this is how she found out about the edict to rid the land of Hebrew babies of a certain age and thus, gave her own child a chance at life.


OR : Is this the story that "the Priesthood" wanted us to believe ???



Source

This is an excellent full and detailed article:
http://www.whale.to/c/babylon.html


"The Priesthood" had a much bigger goal than Egypt in mind, it would seem. Anastasia tells us that by whatever the means, the Priesthood infiltrated the Hebrews and led them out of Egypt by way of a series of miracles. The Priesthood were quite capable of creating such 'miracles' as they had discovered the power of thought and intention through one of Anastasia's many-times-Great Grandfathers, who she talks about in detail in another Chapter I think in another book of the series even, who had lived prior to the ascension of Egypt historically. He had been of the ancient Vedic line and knew many mysteries. An estimated 1,000,000 people, the gold of Egypt which the Egyptians gladly gave to the Hebrews just to get rid of these people out of their land (the people would make a golden calf out of this gold later on in the story), and many herds of cattle, sheep and goats of great value went with the children of Israel that day. Please note:  (1) "Israel" was the name of their ancestor through the lineage of Abraham, (2) Abraham had originally come from Mesopotamia and the tribes of Sumeria as talked about in the books such as "The 12th Planet" by Zecharia Sitchin.


The Hebrews were led out of Egypt under the guidance of "the Priestly line of Levi". God spoke "directly" to Aaron who was the High Priest of the Priests of Levi. During the 40-year sojourn in the desert of what is now modern day Saudi Arabia, the rituals and holy days of the new Tribe of Israel became established. The old defeatist ways of Hebrew slavery under the Pharoahs was eliminated. After two generations, the Israelites were ready to 'claim back' the land of their forefathers... at least, that was "the sell" because Abraham was originally from Iraq !!! The Israelites went to war against all the tribes of Canaan, including the "Philistines" who are the modern day Palestinians !!!

...  and we all know what's happening to the Palestinians  : (


Update March 7, 2016   >> We now learn that The Exodus of the Torah is likely a fiction as disclosed by Israeli archaeologist, Professor at Tel Aviv University, Ze’ev Herzog


As the video by Brother Nathanael below shows, the Egyptian Priesthood who came out of Egypt with the Hebrews in circa 1500 BC are still enjoying power. Certainly, the people mentioned in this video won't be this Priesthood themselves... they will most certainly have been placed in these positions on purpose by those for whom the monetary benefits will be extraordinarily great... just like they did in the olden times, in the days of the Pharoahs in Egypt. Anastasia tells us that those people who are seen, those people in the public eye are NOT the Priests. These are the people who are put out in front so that the real "Priesthood" of around 6 people still operating in our modern world through a line of descendancy, can remain anonymous. Anastasia tells us about The High Priest in the books, how he lives in our modern time and what he does.



Friday, 11 May 2012

IS THE USA A "DEMOCRACY" OR A "REPUBLIC" ??


First published on 11 October 2011.
This is a slightly fragmented video starting with an interview with a man named 'Aaron' I think he is, who had connections to the Rockefeller group. He states a number of things which definitely smack of The Priesthood.

Next up is a young guy protesting outside the NYSE (New York Stock Exchange) who knows his stuff re: the privately owned company, "The US Federal Reserve".  The Fed poses as an arm of the US government, but it is not. Most Americans haven't known this until very recently... part of the purpose of these protests no doubt, to increase the level of awareness in the US population. This young man talks about 'fiat currency', 'derivatives' (brought into being by NZ Prime Minister John Key when he played with the big boys on Wall Street earlier in his financial career) and tax payer paid bail-outs (public money) given to big private Corporations gone bust, such as Freddie Mac & Fanny Mae in 2008-09.*
* "On Oct 21, 2010 FHFA estimates revealed that the bailout of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will likely cost taxpayers $224–360 billion in total, with over $150 billion already provided."  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fannie_Mae

Finally, there are a few short clips high-lighting how the word "Democracy" is regularly used in US politics... but the USA was never set up to be a Democracy this video states, which actually amounts to "rulership by The 1%", ie: The 1% is the Elite, the "money junkies".  A Republic consists of quite separate states, each State with their own laws and financial systems ~ not this combined 'One State' under one centralised government. This was never meant to be as set out by the Founding Fathers.

The mask that you see appear over the faces of the people in this video (super-imposed) is the mask of the "Anonymous" movement. I believe this movement arose organically when global 'computer hackers' got together and infiltrated various government organisations just to show how much power they can have. These hackers are are at the thin end of the wedge, prising open the "old boys club" and their 'inner sanctums'.  "Anonymous" turned up recently in the media as being in support of Julian Assange and his site, "WikiLeaks". "Anonymous" are no doubt affiliated to the "Zeitgeist" movement also, which has been around for the last decade or so.

All of these very large, well-known groups are motivated by exactly the same thing that Anastasia the Siberian recluse is motivated by ~  exposing the cover-ups and leading people to the "Consciousness" of what this system actually is. Anastasia, in the Ringing Cedars of Russia books, calls this system "The Technocracy" and those who benefit from this system at the apex of this "pyramid scheme", she calls "The Priesthood".

People right now right at this moment !! are Waking Up !! from "The Illusion" and the soporific effects of the sleep that The Priesthood have had the common people in, for millennia...  We Are Indeed Waking Up !!!  Just as a quick reminder, today is the first day of the last 18-day period of the Mayan Calendar Ninth Wave.  It will be interesting to see how much of the "Illusion has Unravelled" by October 28 2011, ref: Johan Calleman.

It's interesting that the protest "Occupy Wall Street" which is in its 4th week right now, has led to numerous branch-off protests ~ "Occupy America".  The 'occupation' across the US builds to a crescendo on the weekend of 15-16 October 2011.  US protesters are joined in the "Occupy" movement by thousands of other people in cities all over the world.

It's all such fascinating stuff...  And we're living in it !!!  How privileged to be living at this time in history seeing all these veils of illusion being pulled down in front of our own eyes. The 'wave' that is upon us Socially will be larger than any "tsunami of rights" that the world has ever seen, I believe. Hold on tight folks...  the swell is building...


Uploaded by  on Oct 4, 2011
"We often hear the claim that our nation is a democracy. That wasn't the vision of the founders. They saw democracy as another form of tyranny. If we've become a democracy, I guarantee you that the founders would be deeply disappointed by our betrayal of their vision. The founders intended, and laid out the ground rules, for our nation to be a republic. The word "democracy" appears nowhere in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution -- two most fundamental documents of our nation. Instead of a democracy, the Constitution's Article IV, Section 4, guarantees "to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government." Moreover, let's ask ourselves: Does our pledge of allegiance to the flag say to "the democracy for which it stands," or does it say to "the republic for which it stands"? Or do we sing "The Battle Hymn of the Democracy" or "The Battle Hymn of the Republic"? So what's the difference between republican and democratic forms of government? John Adams captured the essence of the difference when he said, "You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe." Nothing in our Constitution suggests that government is a grantor of rights. Instead, government is a protector of rights. In recognition that it's Congress that poses the greatest threat to our liberties, the framers used negative phrases against Congress throughout the Constitution such as: shall not abridge, infringe, deny, disparage, and shall not be violated, nor be denied. In a republican form of government, there is rule of law. All citizens, including government officials, are accountable to the same laws. Government power is limited and decentralized through a system of checks and balances. Government intervenes in civil society to protect its citizens against force and fraud but does not intervene in the cases of peaceable, voluntary exchange. Contrast the framers' vision of a republic with that of a democracy. In a democracy, the majority rules either directly or through its elected representatives. As in a monarchy, the law is whatever the government determines it to be. Laws do not represent reason.They represent power. The restraint is upon the individual instead of government. Unlike that envisioned under a republican form of government, rights are seen as privileges and permissions that are granted by government and can be rescinded by government. How about a few quotations demonstrating the disdain our founders held for democracy? James Madison, Federalist Paper No. 10: In a pure democracy, "there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual." At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Edmund Randolph said, " ... that in tracing these evils to their origin every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy." John Adams said,"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There was never a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." Chief Justice John Marshall observed, "Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos." In a word or two, the founders knew that a democracy would lead to the same kind of tyranny the colonies suffered under King George III. The framers gave us a Constitution that is replete with undemocratic mechanisms. One that has come in for recent criticism and calls for its elimination is the Electoral College. In their wisdom, the framers gave us the Electoral College so that in presidential elections large, heavily populated states couldn't democratically run roughshod over small, sparsely populated states. Here's my question: Do Americans share the republican values laid out by our founders, and is it simply a matter of our being unschooled about the differences between a republic and a democracy? Or is it a matter of preference and we now want the kind of tyranny feared by the founders where Congress can do anything it can muster a majority vote to do? I fear it's the latter.
Read more: Are we a republic or a democracy?"